Most government policy announcements tell us what policymakers want to build. This one tells us how they expect the market to function.
The Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE) recently released a Model Service Agreement for Electrolyser-as-a-Service (EaaS). With this model agreement, India’s Green Hydrogen Mission is moving beyond production targets or manufacturing incentives, and is beginning to address the commercial relationships that determine whether projects can actually be financed, negotiated and operated.
Emerging industries do not mature through policy support alone. They mature when developers, industrial consumers, service providers, lenders and insurers can transact within a commercial framework that allocates responsibilities clearly, measures performance consistently and distributes risks in a manner that capital understands.
In that context, the Model Service Agreement is more than a legal document; it is part of the commercial architecture that allows an emerging market to function.
Looking Beyond Technology
Public discussion around India’s Green Hydrogen Mission has understandably centred on electrolyser manufacturing, renewable energy integration, production incentives, and ambitious capacity targets. They are indispensable foundations for the sector.
But the success of an industry is rarely determined by technology alone.
As projects move from announcements to implementation, commercial questions become increasingly important. Who owns the asset? Who operates it? How is performance measured? What happens if contractual service levels are not achieved? How are payment obligations secured? What happens when the commercial relationship comes to an end?
They are not just legal details; in reality, they shape investment decisions, financing structures and project bankability. They determine whether counterparties are willing to commit capital over long operating periods.
The release of the Model Service Agreement reflects an appreciation that commercial design is as much significant as technological capability.
When Hydrogen Becomes a Service
The agreement brings a business model that could play an important role in expanding industrial adoption of green hydrogen.
Instead of requiring an industrial consumer to purchase, own and operate an electrolyser, the Electrolyser-as-a-Service model separates asset ownership from hydrogen consumption. The service provider owns, operates and maintains the electrolyser, while the customer procures hydrogen generation as an ongoing service under agreed commercial terms.
For many industrial users, that changes the economics of adoption.
It reduces the need for significant upfront capital investment, transfers equipment maintenance and operational responsibilities to the service provider, and allows businesses to adopt green hydrogen without assuming every technological and lifecycle risk associated with owning the underlying asset.
The arrangement does not eliminate commercial risk. It reallocates it. Many responsibilities that would ordinarily rest with the asset owner are redistributed through contract.
The agreement therefore becomes the mechanism through which performance obligations, operational responsibilities and commercial accountability are allocated between the parties.
Its quality is no longer a legal afterthought. It becomes central to the commercial viability of the project itself.
Why MNRE Chose a Reference Contract
The Model Service Agreement seeks to reduce transaction costs, improve contractual clarity, establish a common framework for allocating responsibilities and risks, and facilitate wider adoption of Electrolyser-as-a-Service arrangements.
Importantly, it has been issued as a reference document rather than a mandatory contractual format, allowing parties to adapt it to project-specific commercial requirements.
That distinction is significant. Emerging industries require both consistency and experimentation. Standardisation reduces negotiation costs and improves market familiarity, but excessive standardisation can constrain commercial innovation while technologies, financing structures and business models are still evolving.
By choosing a reference framework rather than prescribing a compulsory contract, MNRE has attempted to establish a common contractual baseline without limiting commercial flexibility.
It is an approach that encourages convergence in market practice while leaving room for innovation as the sector evolves.
Reading Between the Clauses
The Model Service Agreement also provides useful insight into the commercial issues policymakers consider fundamental to the EaaS model.
It clearly defines the respective responsibilities of the service provider and the customer, establishes the scope of services and sets out the operational framework governing their relationship. The emphasis is not on the transfer of equipment ownership but on the delivery of reliable long-term service outcomes.
Performance obligations occupy a central place in the agreement through provisions relating to service levels, availability commitments, performance guarantees, acceptance testing and operational standards. That emphasis reflects the commercial reality of the EaaS model. Customers are not simply procuring electrolysers; they are relying on sustained operational performance over the life of the contract.
The agreement also establishes a structured framework for pricing methodology, invoicing, payment obligations and financial security arrangements. These provisions underpin the commercial viability of long-term infrastructure projects. Revenue certainty is often as important to project finance as technological performance.
Risk allocation receives similar attention through provisions dealing with equipment ownership, insurance, indemnities, limitation of liability and force majeure.
The agreement also addresses contract duration, termination, asset handover and dispute resolution. These are the provisions that matter most when projects encounter operational or commercial challenges, making legal clarity an essential component of commercial resilience.
Ultimately, the document is doing more than allocating contractual rights; it is defining how commercial responsibility should be shared across a new hydrogen value chain.
One Agreement, Wider Consequences
Standard contractual frameworks create value well beyond the parties signing them.
They reduce negotiation time and minimise the need to repeatedly draft foundational commercial provisions for project developers. For industrial consumers, they provide greater clarity on operational obligations and service expectations.
For lenders, investors and insurers, recurring contractual structures make project risks easier to assess and compare across transactions. And for legal advisers, they establish a common drafting baseline that allows negotiations to focus on project-specific commercial issues rather than revisiting fundamental contractual principles in every deal.
That does not mean every project should look identical.
The value of a model agreement lies in creating consistency where consistency is beneficial while preserving flexibility where commercial circumstances differ. Mature markets do not eliminate negotiation. They reduce unnecessary negotiation over issues that have already acquired broad commercial acceptance.
The electricity sector offers a useful parallel. It did not become investable merely because generation capacity expanded or transmission networks grew. It also developed standard power purchase agreements, grid codes, connectivity frameworks and market rules that gave participants a predictable basis for transacting and allocating risk.
Green hydrogen is beginning to build comparable commercial institutions.
The Market Signal Hidden in Plain Sight
India’s Green Hydrogen Mission will continue to be measured through manufacturing capacity, renewable energy integration and investment commitments. But the release of the Model Service Agreement highlights another dimension of market development.
Large-scale industries do not scale solely because governments announce ambitious policies or because technologies become commercially viable. They also require commercial frameworks that allocate risk clearly, define responsibilities and give investors, developers and customers the confidence to transact over the long term.
Contracts may rarely attract the attention given to production targets or investment announcements, but they are often where markets acquire discipline and policy acquires commercial meaning.
MNRE’s Model Service Agreement is, therefore, more than a contractual reference. It reflects an appreciation that the success of India’s green hydrogen ambitions will depend not only on electrolysers and renewable energy, but also on the commercial architecture that enables projects to move from negotiation to execution.
In emerging industries, technology creates possibility. Commercial architecture turns that possibility into a market.
What other emerging energy markets in India would benefit from similar model contractual frameworks?
_________________________
Want more insights like this?
Click here to join our WhatsApp Channel for strategic communications insights, leadership perspectives, industry observations, in-depth analysis, and practical communications tips.
_________________________
Also read: India Is Preparing for Retail Electricity Competition. Is the Ecosystem Ready?
When Does an Advocate Stop Being an Advocate?